Tim Dwelly

A complainant alleged that Councillor T Dwelly breached the Code of Conduct by posting a meme on a social media feed that read “Grandad didn't vote for fascists, he shot them”, claiming it could be incitement to violence. After assessment, the officer found no breach of the Code and no further action was required.

Outcome: no breach

The complainant alleged that the council member failed to provide minutes, was dismissive and rude when questioned about allotment matters. and did not demonstrate proper procedural guidance. The council considered the allegations and rejected the complaint, finding no breach of the Code of Conduct.

Outcome: no breach

The complainant alleged that Cllr T Dwelly made a divisive comment on a social media post, calling a Labour MP a "Hamas apologist", which they claimed could incite racial and political hatred. The decision found the comment did not constitute a breach of the Code of Conduct and rejected the complaint.

Outcome: no breach

The complainant alleged that Councillor T Dwelly undermined democratic principles by making public comments about Reform UK and other parties, claiming a breach of the Code of Conduct. The decision found no breach and rejected the complaint.

Outcome: no breach

The complainant alleged that Cllr Tim Dwelly shouted at him, calling him a racist over a slogan on his van, claiming disrespect, unlawful discrimination and intimidation. The assessment found the member was acting in a private capacity, so the Code of Conduct did not apply and, even if it had, no breach was found.

Outcome: no breach

The complainant alleged that Councillor T Dwelly ignored a petition signed by over 10,000 local residents concerning the closure of the Waterside Meadery, but the council found that the conduct did not amount to a breach of the Code of Conduct and rejected the complaint.

Outcome: no breach

Complainants alleged that Councillor Tim Dwelly breached the Council Code of Conduct by tweeting an unverified rumor that a 'Porn MP' was from Cornwall; the tweet was removed and an apology issued, and the assessment found a breach but concluded no further action was required.

Outcome: upheld